A correction was not necessary...

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

A correction was not necessary... Written by Arnie Perlstein (11/30/2006 6:16 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Corrections re attributions, penned by JulieW

...because the compliment I paid you was for finding that material from Byrne's and Le Faye's books (I did understand that these were not your original discoveries), and for bringing it all here to this discussion today, for those of us who did not read those books and see those points in the original locations.

But I am glad you are scrupulous about giving credit where credit is due, that is something everyone (and not just we lawyers) should always do. Better safe than sorry.

What do you think about my suggestion of the Harwoods as possible sources for Frances Ward and Mr. Price? (which, after checking my copy of Le Faye's letter, she does not make any mention of, and is, as far as I know, original to me)

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Letter 22: Mrs. E.H.'s former way of life? Line (11/29/2006 6:45 p.m.)

Here's a link from the JulieW (11/30/2006 7:26 a.m.)
- LoL... Robbin (11/30/2006 8:05 a.m.)
  - Duels Robbin (11/30/2006 9:29 a.m.)
    - That was exactly what she feared...... JulieW (11/30/2006 10:13 a.m.)
      - I see this is serious business Robbin (11/30/2006 7:48 p.m.)
      - This thread is wonderful, as is...   Arnie Perlstein (11/30/2006 3:13 p.m.)
        
        Corrections re attributions   JulieW (11/30/2006 5:20 p.m.)
        
        A correction was not necessary...   Arnie Perlstein (11/30/2006 6:16 p.m.)
I think it meant she agreed to marry him... Robbin (11/29/2006 8:16 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo