And here I thought...

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

And here I thought... Written by Line (9/1/2005 9:51 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Oh dear!, penned by Joan Ellen

...that it was the *quality* of the flannel that was contemptible, not the fact that it *was* flannel! ;-) (I didn't catch on to its probable purpose - thanks to those who pointed it out!)

Previous message | Next message | Board index

2s/3d for contemptible flannel Carolyn Ruth (9/1/2005 9:18 a.m.)

In several parts of the world.... Reeba (9/2/2005 2:08 a.m.)
I am afraid the contemptible would outweight the benefit Robbin (9/1/2005 10:15 a.m.)
I think you are correct, Carolyn JulieW (9/1/2005 9:51 a.m.)
- On the other hand... Joan Ellen (9/1/2005 10:57 a.m.)
  - Goodness! JulieW (9/1/2005 11:12 a.m.)
    - from now on! Carolyn Ruth (9/1/2005 11:14 a.m.)
      - Oh dear! Joan Ellen (9/1/2005 2:22 p.m.)
        
        And here I thought... Line (9/1/2005 9:51 p.m.)
- flannel?... Jessica Michelle (9/1/2005 10:36 a.m.)
  - always wondered? CathyW (9/1/2005 5:44 p.m.)
    - I imagine it would be awful... Robbin (9/1/2005 6:40 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo