OK. I am officially confused

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

OK. I am officially confused Written by Golda (9/1/2005 4:04 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Which all calls into question, penned by JulieW

These varied references from Tomalin, Modert and LeFaye are confusing me. Unless some as yet undiscovered information surfaces, we are left to draw our own conclusions based on these viewpoints.

It makes more sense to me that entire letters would be destroyed rather than lines cut out. In view of my understanding of how two close sisters (or very good friends!) correspond, I can well imagine that some of JA's letters were best not left for posterity.

Until Julie posts another reference to confuse me further ;-) I am of the view that letters went into the 19th century shredder -- the fireplace.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Vigor of Monk? Robbin (9/1/2005 7:28 a.m.)

No picture as far as I am aware JulieW (9/1/2005 8:37 a.m.)
- very disturbing indeed Carolyn Ruth (9/1/2005 9:24 a.m.)
  - Yes , JulieW (9/1/2005 9:47 a.m.)
  - In bad taste Golda (9/1/2005 9:52 a.m.)
    - But, you see.... JulieW (9/1/2005 10:14 a.m.)
      - A very good point with regards to CEA. :) nfm Robbin (9/1/2005 10:20 a.m.)
      - I agree   Golda (9/1/2005 12:52 p.m.)
        
        The long accepted view.   JulieW (9/1/2005 1:56 p.m.)
        
        Which all calls into question   JulieW (9/1/2005 2:44 p.m.)
        
        OK. I am officially confused   Golda (9/1/2005 4:04 p.m.)
        
        Im sorry if I am not clear.nfm.   JulieW (9/1/2005 4:14 p.m.)
        
        Entire letters is what I always thought, too   Line (9/1/2005 9:55 p.m.)
        
        Snooping...?   JulieW (9/1/2005 5:14 p.m.)
        
        After nearly 200 years....   Reeba (9/1/2005 5:34 p.m.)
        
        Time makes all the difference   Mary Ellen (9/2/2005 1:12 p.m.)
        
        I can definitely see Golda's POV, but...   Line (9/1/2005 10:11 p.m.)
        
        Jane had similar qualms...   Jeanne (9/2/2005 9:15 p.m.)
        
        Janes scruples were in another direction...   Reeba (9/3/2005 7:14 a.m.)
        
        No,I dont think that was it   JulieW (9/3/2005 11:08 a.m.)
      - I have been pondering over... Reeba (9/1/2005 1:32 p.m.)
    - Speaking of Ms Bates Carolyn Ruth (9/1/2005 11:49 a.m.)
  - Oh yes... Robbin (9/1/2005 10:00 a.m.)
  - And it makes her human Cheryl (9/1/2005 11:33 a.m.)
    - Yes, probably JulieW (9/1/2005 11:39 a.m.)
      - LOL!   Cheryl (9/1/2005 11:56 a.m.)
        
        More LOL   Carolyn Ruth (9/1/2005 12:25 p.m.)
        
        *Snort*   gkb (9/1/2005 6:46 p.m.)
        
        Oh, you witty people!   Line (9/1/2005 10:17 p.m.)
    - Taken aback, at first Maisy (9/1/2005 3:16 p.m.)
  - I am inclined to... Reeba (9/1/2005 3:54 p.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo