Goldsmisth interpretation-again ;-)

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Goldsmisth interpretation-again ;-) Written by JulieW (8/24/2004 4:52 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Anne's Letter, penned by Carolyn

If you consider the letter by Anne Boylen(real or forged)it is again irritating , to me at least , to find that Goldsmith decides not to quote from it direct but to "invent" it ?

I wonder if JA had access to a copy in some publication of the "real" letter and decided to make this point(" I have included in my history the real date of the letter,whereas GOldsmith just invented the contents). ;-)

Previous message | Next message | Board index

a date! Emmeline (8/23/2004 9:18 a.m.)

Well not quite ;-) JulieW (8/23/2004 11:15 a.m.)
- How long is Goldsmith's history? Karen G (8/24/2004 8:52 p.m.)
  - I have the four volumes JulieW (8/26/2004 4:57 a.m.)
    - Oh, but... Karen G (8/27/2004 2:08 a.m.)
- sorry... Emmeline (8/24/2004 9:46 a.m.)
  - My pleasure! ;-) nfm. JulieW (8/24/2004 9:48 a.m.)
- Perhaps I could write a history book too? Deborah d'Bajor (8/24/2004 4:43 a.m.)
- Anne's Letter Carolyn (8/23/2004 10:35 p.m.)
  - Goldsmisth interpretation-again ;-) JulieW (8/24/2004 4:52 a.m.)
  - The Hollow Crown Cheryl (8/24/2004 2:54 a.m.)
  - From the Lady in the Tower... Mandy N (8/24/2004 2:35 a.m.)
May Day. Mandy N (8/23/2004 9:34 a.m.)
- I agree... Jean B (8/23/2004 10:52 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo