View thread | Previous message | Next message


GR: Childhood illnesses   Written by Line (10/29/2003 7:26 p.m.)
Are you new?

After the whole discussion about the life-threatening nature of childhood diseases at that time, I was especially struck by this comment on p.120:

At school the risk of infection was ever-present; the irruption of fever at the boys' school in Cheam provoked a frantic dash to withdraw the children.

Even today, a school is an excellent place for a child to pick up whatever infection is going around. I really wonder how 18th-century parents could bear to send their children to boarding school!

Further down the page, it says:

...the Greene family apprehensively experimented with inoculation for smallpox convinced of the *inefficacy* of vaccination, only to see their darling baby daughter suffer horribly.

I'm not quite clear as to whether they did or didn't have their daughter vaccinated. Were they upset because they had her vaccinated and she had a bad reaction, or because they didn't have her vaccinated and she later came down with the disease?


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Gentleman's Daughter Group Read is maintained by Laraine with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast