Question

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Question Written by Robbin (4/15/2008 9:41 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Difference in definitions?, penned by Tracy W

You are right the text does not say Emma dislikes giving the Bates material gifts; it does not have too. The text says Emma does not contribute “what she ought to the stock of their scanty comforts” instead. If you agree stocks refers to supplies; do you still see Emma’s “not contributing what she ought to the stock of their scanty comforts” as referring to her dislike of visiting the Bates?

Previous message | Next message | Board index

A waste of time… Robbin (4/13/2008 6:05 a.m.)

the debate Kelsey (4/15/2008 11:21 p.m.)
- Crying foul for Emma Robbin (4/17/2008 1:43 a.m.)
- Well said, indeed! Ramya (4/16/2008 4:00 p.m.)
- Well said, Kelsey. nfm Rachel G (4/16/2008 8:12 a.m.)
Gosh what a shocking crime Tracy W (4/14/2008 5:48 a.m.)
- I think very differently (long) Robbin (4/15/2008 12:48 a.m.)
  - Virtues do call for softer judgment of sins Tracy W (4/15/2008 4:41 a.m.)
    - Well Robbin (4/15/2008 10:51 a.m.)
    - And as for material things go Ramya (4/15/2008 6:26 a.m.)
- Another instance concerning visiting, etc. BarbaraB (4/14/2008 4:08 p.m.)
  - An unbecoming parade… Robbin (4/15/2008 1:04 a.m.)
  - Mr Knightley finds Emma pardonable Tracy W (4/14/2008 6:49 p.m.)
    - I may have missed... BarbaraB (4/15/2008 1:01 a.m.)
      - Difference in definitions?   Tracy W (4/15/2008 8:31 a.m.)
        
        :) nfm.   BarbaraB (4/16/2008 8:50 p.m.)
        
        Question   Robbin (4/15/2008 9:41 a.m.)
        
        A bit more precise than that   Tracy W (4/15/2008 10:37 a.m.)
        
        Well   Robbin (4/15/2008 10:45 a.m.)
        
        Literary license   nan duval (4/15/2008 1:40 p.m.)
        
        Works for me, lol (nfm)   BarbaraB (4/16/2008 8:52 p.m.)
        
        LOL! Every feature works. (;D) nfm   Robbin (4/15/2008 9:58 p.m.)
        
        Emotional/social   Tracy W (4/15/2008 11:50 a.m.)
- I think the greatest fault we've seen so far in Emma Joan Ellen (4/14/2008 9:13 a.m.)
- I agree Ramya (4/14/2008 6:56 a.m.)
Emma reminds me nan duval (4/13/2008 5:51 p.m.)
- Emma is a snob Lisa M. (4/14/2008 12:01 p.m.)
Emma isn´t that bad... MarianneR (4/13/2008 10:23 a.m.)
- Who said Emma did nothing at all? Robbin (4/13/2008 9:05 p.m.)
  - Emma's charities Tarn (4/15/2008 1:49 a.m.)
    - Less charity incurs more vexation for Emma Robbin (4/15/2008 3:59 a.m.)
      - I agree with you both & very well put! nfm nan duval (4/15/2008 8:16 p.m.)
  - Sorry, I didn´t want to "quarrel" MarianneR (4/14/2008 4:11 a.m.)
    - Emma has some negative qualities… Robbin (4/15/2008 2:38 a.m.)
      - I got the point! ;D *nfm* MarianneR (4/15/2008 6:15 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo