Frank is certainly at fault

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Frank is certainly at fault Written by Rachel G (4/13/2008 4:55 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, Frank has not, penned by JulieW

I understand why Frank should have made the effort to come, and why Mr Knightley disapproves. It just seemed to me that Mr Knightley's disapproval was expressed with considerable vehemence, and wondered whether there was more going on here than the surface meaning - perhaps something to do with the interaction between him and Emma, or the relationship between the two speakers.

I'm not sure quite what I am getting at here - it's just a hunch that there may be more going on here than is at first apparent. This novel is so multi-layered that I am beginning to look at every interaction with a suspicious eye!

Previous message | Next message | Board index

Frank's absence & Mr Knightley's annoyance. Rachel G (4/13/2008 3:20 p.m.)

Frank has not JulieW (4/13/2008 4:27 p.m.)
- Frank is certainly at fault Rachel G (4/13/2008 4:55 p.m.)
  - Emma's with you Tracy W (4/14/2008 12:24 p.m.)
  - I had the same idea MarianneR (4/14/2008 4:30 a.m.)
    - Stirred up out of jealousy? Russell (4/14/2008 2:43 p.m.)
      - Yet earlier there is evidence... Moni (4/22/2008 9:49 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo