Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


But her first premise is false, isn't it?   Written by Joan Ellen (4/7/2008 8:59 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Not a circular argument, penned by Tracy W
Are you new?

If Harriet has a liberal allowance, it is not unreasonable to conclude that her father (or whoever is responsible for her) is rich -- but a person can certainly be rich without being a gentleman.

Which is why Emma must bolster her case by saying that Harriet associates with gentlemen's daughters, i.e, with Emma herself (unless she refers here to other pupils at Mrs. Goddard's, but the only other ones we've heard of so far are the Miss Martins, who are not a gentleman's daughters). And the only reason Harriet is fit to associate Emma, is because she is a gentleman's daughter.

I don't think I can explain myself any more clearly than this, but to my mind it is still a circular argument.


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast