Whoops - by "later" I meant in subsequent correspondenc

Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message

Whoops - by "later" I meant in subsequent correspondenc Written by Kathleen Glancy (3/18/2011 1:26 p.m.) in consequence of the missive, No, your first view was right, penned by Kathleen Glancy

not later in the same letter that I quoted.

Previous message | Next message | Board index

The Dedication of "Emma" Jane Marie (3/18/2011 5:54 a.m.)

A Novel of the Day Jane Marie (3/19/2011 9:36 a.m.)
No, your first view was right Kathleen Glancy (3/18/2011 12:17 p.m.)
- Emma dedication Bridget D (3/19/2011 6:40 a.m.)
  - If dedicating the book to him provoked her satire of him, no Tarn (3/19/2011 12:22 p.m.)
    - Except that Kathleen Glancy (3/19/2011 2:53 p.m.)
      - Politics Bridget D (3/19/2011 5:09 p.m.)
      - Good point. (nfm) Tarn (3/19/2011 3:06 p.m.)
- Whoops - by "later" I meant in subsequent correspondenc Kathleen Glancy (3/18/2011 1:26 p.m.)
I think Austen threw in a few references to the Prince Nina RG (3/18/2011 7:33 a.m.)
How much of the Prince is in "Emma"? Bridget D (3/18/2011 6:30 a.m.)
- Harriet's secret parentage may be a sly reference... Anne-Marie (3/18/2011 10:45 a.m.)
  - Harriet Bridget D (3/18/2011 5:36 p.m.)
  - I think it might Tarn (3/18/2011 1:12 p.m.)
    - Of course! Lisa Dalrymple (3/18/2011 4:31 p.m.)
      - LOL! Although Tarn (3/18/2011 5:36 p.m.)
        
        I need a ~suth~ Lisa Dalrymple (3/18/2011 6:23 p.m.)
  - I don't think so Kathleen Glancy (3/18/2011 11:36 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index

Home

Site Map

JAInfo