Didn't mean to imply that

Didn't mean to imply that Written by BarbaraB (3/15/2011 11:50 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Dinner invites, penned by Bridget D

Only meant to say that you were both right in my opinion. If that implication was in there, I apologize.

These lines have always bothered me Lauren Ashley (3/14/2011 1:26 p.m.)

chap 7 vs chap 55 Nikki N (3/15/2011 2:50 a.m.)
- "Even for Mr Elton!" Kathleen Glancy (3/15/2011 2:12 p.m.)
I don't read it that way Laraine (3/14/2011 1:47 p.m.)
- I don't read it that way either, but ... gianni (3/14/2011 7:53 p.m.)
  - I think it is due to their married states. Reeba (3/15/2011 6:01 p.m.)
  - Harriet and Emma sinking Bridget D (3/15/2011 6:46 a.m.)
    - I don't agree Ramya (3/15/2011 8:56 a.m.)
      - Class and Harriet and Emma   Bridget D (3/15/2011 9:11 a.m.)
        
        The point I disagree with is that   Ramya (3/15/2011 9:23 a.m.)
        
        Martins and Coles   Bridget D (3/15/2011 10:48 a.m.)
        
        You're probably both right   BarbaraB (3/15/2011 10:04 a.m.)
        
        Dinner invites   Bridget D (3/15/2011 10:52 a.m.)
        
        Didn't mean to imply that   BarbaraB (3/15/2011 11:50 a.m.)
        
        Emma and classes   Bridget D (3/16/2011 2:50 p.m.)
        
        No problem, thanks for explanation :) nfm   BarbaraB (3/16/2011 5:47 p.m.)
        
        OOh Dear I did slip   Bridget D (3/18/2011 8:36 a.m.)

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.

View thread | Previous message | Next message Board index

- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -