Quick Index Board Index Home FAQ Site Map

View thread | Previous message | Next message


Is it necessarily about rank? Could it be about good-breeding?   Written by Tom P2 (2/13/2011 4:32 a.m.) in consequence of the missive, Emma and Mrs/Miss Bates -- what a sad commentary on, penned by AnnetteJ
Are you new?

OK, that may sound like splitting hairs, but here's an example from S+S ch32 with two ladies of equal birth - Lady Middleton and Mrs Palmer - where the one with less polished manners oppresses the heroine and the one with more polished manners doesn't. The calm and polite unconcern of Lady Middleton on the occasion was an happy relief to Elinor's spirits, ... she was sometimes worried down by officious condolence to rate good-breeding as more indispensable to comfort than good-nature.

Good-breeding may tend to follow class lines, but I think it's not an absolute rule. For example, Mr Woodhouse sounds like he's had less vexation from James's daughter - the civil, pretty-spoken girl who always turns the lock of the door the right way and never bangs it (ch1) - than from Mr John Knightley. Perhaps Emma's inherited a bit of her father's sensitivity about manners?


Previous message | Next message | Board index

All messages in the thread


Password:

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.


View thread | Previous message | Next message
Board index

Group Read Board Pride & Prejudice Board Emma Board Sense & Sensibility Board Persuasion Board Mansfield Park Board Northanger Abbey Board Austenuations Board Jane Austen's Life & Times Board Lady Catherine & Co. Board Library Board Virtual Views Board Ramble Board Meetings Board Newcomers' Board Milestones Board Help Board Pemberleans Board





- Jane Austen | Republic of Pemberley -

Quick Index Home Site Map JAInfo

© 2004 - 2012 The Republic of Pemberley

Get copyright permissions

Quantcast