Quick Index
Board Index
Home
FAQ
Site Map
settlements
Written by Nikki N
(1/29/2011 12:06 a.m.)
in consequence of the missive, The normal practice, penned by Kathleen Glancy
In the Woodhouses' case however, the situation appears to be the opposite -- the funds were very large -- about 60,000 to be divided between two sisters. So I wonder if it would all go to the girls immediately on their marriage, or it was settled so that it would defintely go to them after their father's death, but that in the meantime, the married woman would also receive an allowance from the settled funds -- perhaps on half of it, while the income from the other half would be retained by their father in his lifetime e.g. "a life interest on a moiety" seemed also a common practice for a surviving parent. Unlike the Bennets, the Dashwoods and the Elliots, there appeared to be no entail or settlement on a male heir for Hartfield. Daughters in general inherit equally under the law unless different provisions or settlements had been made in the family -- but I've read cases where the settlement made was that the property would go to the eldest son, or if there is no son, then to the eldest daughter -- if there was such a settlement, then Hartfield would go to Isabella. |

Groupread is maintained by Myretta with WebBBS 3.21.
